Thanks Craven. Your reminder to always comply with the contest rules is much appreciated and really good advice.
I especially like blind judging. Where I went to college, all English majors had to pass a comprehensive exam, with the first try at the end of your junior year. If you didn't pass it then, you had the opportunity to take the test again at the end of your senior year.
My course grades tended to be mediocre in spite of a lot of hard work on my part. I was rather shy back then, and besides, brown-nosing really bothered me so I didn't practice it to get good grades. I didn't stick out in class and, as a result, professors judged me as mediocre and graded accordingly, even though my work was always handed in before it was due and was well-researched and neatly typed (on my trusty portable Smith-Corona).
I took the comprehensive exam as a junior (all 16 hours of it) and it was graded blindly. We were given an ID number to write on the front page of each blue book. Only the department head knew who was who. When I appeared at his office door two weeks later to pick up my test score, he was truly embarrassed to tell me that I had the top score out of all juniors and seniors and apologized for his colleagues who had prejudged my course work.
I guess the word got around campus, because I made the Deans List both semesters of my senior year. I think a few professors got the message... namely to grade on substance, not personality.
By the way, I went to the same college that expelled J.D. Salinger for his poor writing (I also had the two professors who expelled him!). Go figure!