The Writer magazine forum is FREE to browse. LOGIN | REGISTER with The Writer magazine Web site.
Welcome to The Writer   Faq | Login | Register  

Pet peeves

Started by Carmeniris at 12-11-2008 9:11 PM. Topic has 4 replies.
Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   12-11-2008, 9:11 PM
Carmeniris

Joined on 01-08-2004
Posts 3
Pet Peeve-Good authors turned bad.
I just (did not) finish reading two books by authors that in the past were two of my favorites, both very well known. I'm sure neither book would have found a publisher except for whom the authors are. Lucky for me, I borrowed both from the library since their work has been going down hill for years. It's a shame that sure money has taken the place of good literary work and that former great authors have no problem with submiting trash just for the bucks. One of them, even wrote a book on writing-when he was still respected. Too bad that really talented authors have such a hard time finding agents and these guys are still raking in the money. Where are the classics of the future supposed to come from?  
   Report Abuse 
   12-14-2008, 4:38 PM
Guenever

Joined on 12-14-2008
New York
Posts 2
Re: Pet Peeve-Good authors turned bad.
it is too bad.  i think part of it is pressure to produce, but the other part of it is--laziness?  i don't know.  but i read somewhere---might have been in the writer--go figure--that james patterson doesn't even write his own books.  what they hey?  i've never read patterson, but he does a story outline and others write it, and then he reads it and adds changes.  that isn't being a writer...bogus.  i just finished twilight--which was okay.  all my students, or the girls, are bustling aobut it. it wasn't great.  the story line is the popular thing---and i've read plenty of books that i wouldn't say are wonderfully written, but i really enjoy the story.  not even that much with twilight.  i guess i am ranting---the future classics?  hmmm, if my students are any inclination---no one will read the classics.  lol. um, i think the classics will come from less prolific but stunning authors like ian mcewan--who will never gain superstar status, but whose books are an experience.

Blessed Be

From the Faerie Kingdom

Isle of Avalon--my site
   Report Abuse 
   01-17-2009, 7:03 PM
writeroffthelake

Joined on 01-18-2009
Posts 4
Re: Pet Peeve-Good authors turned bad.
Did you check the publication date to be sure that it is a new book by the author?  Sometimes I've read books by an author I've really liked and wondered why the book was inferior to their other books, then when I checked the publication date, I realized the book was written earlier in their career and I assumed the writing may have seemed inferior because they'd improved their craft.

www.writeroffthelake.com
   Report Abuse 
   03-27-2009, 10:10 PM
WardGreene

Joined on 03-28-2009
Posts 4
Re: Pet Peeve-Good authors turned bad.

 There are various reasons. They might include:

(1) An author starts out full of energy and ideas,and they work just fine,and he/she builds a name. The author has a lot to say.After some years, he has run out of the things he really wanted to say,without repeating himself again and again,and he tries for books equal to early successful ones,but unless a new idea suddenly strikes,he is going downhill. You can't be world champion forever.

(2) He makes a splash, publishes his best stuff,and his publisher wants more....his agent/editor asks if maybe he has something from his early days that was rejected originally,and off they go  again. But YOU notice the difference.

(3) Often,though not exactly the "over the years" way you are meaning, an author will not get his first book published,but numbers two and three really take off....and then the publisher keenly publishes the first but unpublished book,which may well have been from the writer's "learning period",or an okay book but a totally different genre,which does not suit the tastes of his fans for his newer books.

(4) The publishers asks for more books.The author previously did one book in about three years or more,and now he's expected to  do at least one book a year and still keep the same quality level.That is probably difficult for  even a topnotch author,though there are exceptions.

(5) Same problem as number (4),but the author solves it by getting other people to write under his name.They write the book,meaning it's very different to what you expect,but his name is on the cover and the general outline is the same. Sometimes an author will team up and have both names on the cover.

(6) Sometimes the writer has gotten rich and successful and,in a sense,couldn't be bothered.He's now found so many other things to give him a full and happy lifestyle.

(7) Sadly,sometimes the author has  turned into a drunk or whatever.

(8) Sometimes it's just old age that comes to everyone. He still might be  very intelligent,but if,say,he was a thriller writer,can no longer  feel the empathy for his hero  going into highly dangerous sitiations  that he may have found exciting when he was a younger author.

(9) And maybe he has been asked by his publisher tio make the books more politically correct,cut down on the violence,cut out whatever,add more swearing and slang and sex or whatever.....and you,the loyal reader,finds the new books not so good,and the author would probably agree with you.

And there are  probably many other reasons.

   Report Abuse 
   04-05-2009, 10:35 AM
HollyChristine

Joined on 03-13-2009
Posts 7
Re: Pet Peeve-Good authors turned bad.

The only James Patterson that I've read is the Nicholas Sparks-like "Suzanne's Diary for Nicholas."

Did you know Patterson was an ad-guy and came up with the "Toys R Us Kid" slogans? I just read that somewhere...

   Report Abuse 
The Writer » FREE forums: General (open to all; must register to post) » Pet peeves Forum Jump:

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems