You realize that "acceptable to editors" is kind of like "appealling to people". Lot of variety.
Clips serve two purposes. What I consider the baser one is allowing the editor the luxury of having his decisions made for him (kind of like a press release just does some hack's writing for him).
The more useful purpose (to a more useful editor) is to give a sample of your work, see if your skills or style fit his needs. In which case anything he can see will help him decide. Personally, I'd much rather click to a couple of links than deal with a bunch of xeroxed clips, but again, results may vary.
One more way of looking at this: you go with what you have at the time. If you have online stuff you should certainly include the links. I would chose really great stuff (obviously) and perhaps stuff like the editor runs with an eye also to brevity.
One more consideration here: can it hurt to include the links?
And a bonus consideration at no extra cost: if you are emailing your query, what ELSE can you include? One way I often do this is to cite some magazines I've written for, but mention that there are links below to be viewed immediately.