The Writer magazine forum is FREE to browse. LOGIN | REGISTER with The Writer magazine Web site.
Welcome to The Writer   Faq | Login | Register  

Pet peeves

Started by belowtheradar at 04-17-2006 11:39 AM. Topic has 3 replies.
Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   04-17-2006, 11:39 AM
belowtheradar

Joined on 04-23-2005
Posts 87
more annotated rejection letters

Some of them are so surreal that they have to be shared. Like this one, that turns a corner and rounds a couple curves before it finally ends:

Dear (my name)

Thanks so much for sending your query, and for offering me the chance to consider your material. Unfortunately, your project does not seem right for me.  My decision reflects my present workload and my current interests. It may also be that yours is not the type of book I handle. For more about the kinds of books I do represent, go to (URL of the agent's website)
 and click on my name. Since it's crucial that you find an agent who is extremely enthusiastic about your book project, I urge you to continue to seek representation, especially since this is such a subjective business -- what works for one agent or publisher may not work as well for another. One tip--find books that are similar to yours (same genre, subject, intended audience, etc.) and check the Acknowledgments section for the name of the agent. Then reference that book in your query letter. Just FYI, I never open unsolicited attachments or visit unsolicited websites.

Best of luck!

Sincerely yours, (agent's name)

Good advide, to be sure. Find out what kind of books the agent represents before sending the query. I did visit the agent's web site before sending the query. There are a couple generic genres of fiction, and a handful that the agent doesn't represent. No client list, no recent sales, nothing on which to base an educated guess re what the agent does represent. At least she used my real name in the greeting instead of "Dear Author."

I thought dashes were properly used in pairs, and single dashes replaced by colons or eliminated by starting a new sentence. Noah Lukeman, in his book on queries, devotes an entire paragraph (!) to how the incorrect use of dashes can flag an inexperienced writer.

I love these rambling rejections. As if the more explanation offered, the better the agent feels about rejecting the submission (and the more patronized the writer feels).

Equally as amusing is the two line rejection (praise the Lord for the economy of words) under  which appears the agency's name, mailing address, and phone number! Do they really think I'm going to write to them, or call them long distance, after being rejected?

 


 

   Report Abuse 
   04-23-2006, 8:02 AM
strenge

Joined on 04-21-2006
Posts 20
Re: more annotated rejection letters

   Everybody gets frustrated when they get rejections. I think Edison experimented with something like over a thousand light bulbs before he found one that worked. It still shines on my hometown's fire house. They're scared to turn it off. I say I think because I don't actually remember the amount off the top of my head. I just remember the plaque on the wall that started with the question that was something to the wording of; "Didn't you get frustrated after so many failures?" to which he responded, "No. Now I know a thousand ways in which a lightbulb can't be made." Get used to it. Honestly, you will never awake to that eight-and-a-half by eleven piece of paper printing its way out of your fax machine telling you EXACTLY what needs to be done to pull off which ever dream you are instilling upon others.

   And stop calling the agents on their grammatical errors. They didn't consult a style guide in their effort to be polite with you. Nobody is as precise and accurate a writer as you have proven yourself to be. Maybe it's the perfection that is turning your would-be agents away. Too afraid to evolve and acknowledge the mistakes you and all brilliant minds make.

 

   Report Abuse 
   04-24-2006, 12:23 PM
belowtheradar

Joined on 04-23-2005
Posts 87
Re: more annotated rejection letters

Maybe it's the perfection that is turning your would-be agents away . . .

Then I'll put a couple typos in my next query and see if that works, :)

Agents would have you believe that they're a combination of God, your parents when you were eight years old, and a high school vice-principal. Far from the case. Some are hacks who couldn't sell their own writing. Some were owed favors and set up with an office in a big agency, and a few clients to practice on (this is called "building a client list"). Some are out and out head cases who still manage to function in normal society.

No one will tell you this when you start out. You certainly won't find such wisdom in any of those books on how to write novels that sell, written by authors who've never published a novel.

 

   Report Abuse 
   08-15-2006, 1:53 PM
Erika

Joined on 08-15-2006
Georgia
Posts 9
Re: more annotated rejection letters

While I understand your frustration and don't disagree with your points, reality is reality.  A major publisher (or minor for that matter) will not accept unagented submissions.  Agents are a necessary part of the business and I believe the majority of them are well-meaning.  It does no good to blame an agent for our rejections.  The point is, if we're getting rejected time and again, the problem rests with the author, not the person reading the query. 

That being said, publishing is as much about good writing as about selling books.  Agents have to believe that your project is marketable.  It's up to us to convince them of that.  And then, to write one hell of a good book.

In the end, like in any art, I think luck plays a huge role.  Who sees your work when and are they in a good mood when they see it.  It ain't a comforting realization and it's inordinately frutstrating.  But this is as much a business as a passion.

Erika


Christine
check out my blog at http://oldsinnerschurch.blogspot.com
   Report Abuse 
The Writer » FREE forums: General (open to all; must register to post) » Pet peeves Forum Jump:

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems