The Writer magazine forum is FREE to browse. LOGIN | REGISTER with The Writer magazine Web site.
Welcome to The Writer   Faq | Login | Register  

Pet peeves

Started by jkrplagiarizes at 01-31-2005 9:52 PM. Topic has 108 replies.
  Page 2 of 6 (109 items) < 1 2 3 4 5 > ... Last »
Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   01-31-2005, 9:52 PM
jkrplagiarizes

Joined on 01-31-2005
Posts 2
Post Icon RE: RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
QUOTE: Originally posted by Katwriter

LOL....Oh look who's back! [:p]

I wonder what the "jkr" stands for in your screen name.

You truly are a sick individual. You really should seek some help.


If your 'detective' work ever pans out, you'll see that you were the aggressor in this whole thing anyway. If you'd like me to stop posting on public boards, you could always ask.

I'm just stopping by to say 'hi'. I see you and yours are still getting along wonderfully with others. Maybe I'll pop by the big party on Friday. Sounds like a real hoot.

Sorry for interrupting the argument, please continue.
   Report Abuse 
   01-31-2005, 9:57 PM
zubbycat

Joined on 05-12-2004
Canada
Posts 1,064
RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
Didn't we tell you to go crawl back in your hole last time, buddy? Take a long hike; preferably very far from civilization. Go ahead. Get lost.

zubbycat [:(!]

"Never try to outstubborn a cat." - Unknown
"Writing is easy. All you have to do is cross out the wrong words." - Mark Twain
   Report Abuse 
   02-01-2005, 10:49 AM
Mike27


Joined on 06-22-2004
Alberta, Canada
Posts 152
RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
Hey Kat

About this fella who apparantly has nothing better to do in his sorry life than cyber-stalk you, I give you the words of Steve Polyak;
"Before we work on artificial intelligence why don't we do something about natural stupidity?"

Oh, wait...was that arrogant?
[}:)]

"Every man is the architect of his own fortune." --Appius Claudius
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 12:25 AM
Rosarium

Joined on 10-19-2003
Texas
Posts 142
RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
I like what you posted Muse-less.

Rosarium
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 11:46 AM
Jamesaritchie

Joined on 04-11-2002
Posts 3,588
Post Icon RE: RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
QUOTE: Originally posted by LeeAnnSontheimerMurphy

Somehow I think that perhaps Factuality might be including me among the "regulars" here on the Forum who lack any knowledge worth sharing. Even if I'm wrong about that, I have something to say.

I've become really, really weary of the word wars, the egos, and the sales pitches from various sites. I'm tired of the game playing and the one-upmanship.

When I post here I hope to offer something of what I've learned in more than twenty years as a freelance writer - not two decades of closet writing or playing a writer game - but twenty years of credits, publications, and paychecks.

I'm not here to sell books or services from my website. I don't make an official announcement each time I have a new byline or clip. I don't need to - I established myself as a writer long ago.

Although writing books may be of assistance in honing the craft of writing, it is no substitute for experience or work. I've read a great deal about truck driving. I've known quite a few truck drivers and former drivers including my husband. And, while I could adequately write about driving a eighteen wheeled truck, I couldn't drive one down the highway. That' s something I would have to learn how to do by doing it.

The same would hold true for many areas. Reading medical self-help guides doesn't make me an accomplished physician nor does perusing cookbooks make anyone an excellent cook. Hands on experience does.

Rather than expend any more effort in further honest attempts to share information with others or offer advice to posed questions, I'll be writing. I may join in a few discussions but I won't offer any tangible information.

I'll put that energy where it should be - in my writing. Watch for my byline coming to a publication near you.




I can only say that before I did learn to drive a big rig I had to read about it first, and it helped tremendously. I still had to drive the thing to do the real learning, but knowing how everything worked before I got in made it ten times easier. And I could, in fact, do just about everything the first time I climbed behind the wheel because I had read the book. The main things I had to learn by doing was how long it takes to stop a loaded truck, and how wide the turns are going to be. But since the book had warned me of these things, I was ready for the problems.

Of fthe top of my head, I can't think of a single profession that doesn't begin with books. I'm sure there are some, but not many. Certainly every profession taught in college begins with books, and so do nearly all those that are taught in technical school.

No, reading books doesn't make you a physician, but if there's a physician out there who started practicing his trade before he'd read a great many books on the suvbject, I sure don't want him as my family doctor. And the best cooks I've ever known use cookbooks each and every day. Cooking may be a great example, in fact. Why on earth would you want to try learning the resipe for a cake all on your own when you have only to open a cookbook and quickly learn from someone else's experience, saving yourself endless failures before you get it right.

Read and writing are the important things, but not reading the how-to books and magazines wityhout doubt makes the road a heck of a lot harder to travel. I can't even imagine how you'd know what a transition is, or what the various forms of POV are, or what an inverted pyramid is, or what a hundred other things are unless you read it somewhere.

Reading and writing are the grit, but just as a physician isn't going to start cutting open an abdomen without having read some books first, and just as a cook has to be taught by someone, a writer has to learn somewhere, and while I suppose it's possible to learn how to write well just by reading and writing, I wouldn't want to hold my breath until until you learned all that's needed by this process.

It is possible to tell which writers have done their homework and which haven't, and the comparisons are usually pretty striking.

As an editor, I can't even tink how I would talk to a writer about rewrting something like a novel unless that writer had read enough how-to books and magazines, or learned teh equivalent in good writing classes where books will also be assigned, to know what I'm talking about.

How-to books and magazines aren't supposed to substitue for the work itself, but they can and do make the work a heck of a lot easier to learn, and save editors a lot of headaches they shouldn't have.
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 11:57 AM
Jamesaritchie

Joined on 04-11-2002
Posts 3,588
Post Icon RE: RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
[quoteThe purpose of my question was to find out why editors are not published writers? Again as a newcomer to this field, I did not know this.
My first impression is that it would be like being cut from the team by someone who has never played the game. But if that’s the way it is then that’s the way it is.

I’d suggest everyone switch to decaf and don’t take life so personally.



Actually, a great many editors are pubished writers, and a great many more who aren't published have a very good reason. . .they prefer editing to writing. I've known some editors who were once award winning writers, but who gave up writing for editing.

Editing is a hectic job, and quite often one of those jobs where you have to make a decision between editing and writing. There's seldom time to do both, and editing itself can suck the writing out of you. I've known writers who became editors, and soon quit because they realized it's too hard to do both, and i've know writers who became editors and gave up writing for the same reason.

And they are different skills. But also in my experience, I've found those good at editing are almost always good at writing it's just that writing isn't their main interest. Seems odd to most writers that someone good at writing would prefer editing, but it happens often.

But whether or not you can write, as an editor you can tell whether or not a writer has studied grammar, and you can tell whether or not a writer has actually studied writing, as opposed to just reading and writing it. You can also tell whether or not the writer has read your guidelines.
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 3:06 PM
lisaloganwrites

Joined on 11-13-2004
Sandwiched between LA and Palm Springs
Posts 35
Post Icon RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
Time for a milk and cookies break here. Put your feet up and relax. No one is claiming that reading a book on writing will turn you into Hemingway.

Di's views are hardly unique among editors. I've had professional dealings with her and she isn't just off the farm. I'm shocked at how many people treated her like something brown they noticed on the bottom of their shoe.

The numbers say it all. We've heard the 90% speech. According to Hermann's guide, many agents and publishers are actually reporting 99%. When asked why, the horse's mouths state it's because writers either don't know craft or how to query, format, or perform some other skill. hmmm. If you never had a lick of instruction on writing but your first piece was pubbed by one of the Big 7, then Di's post wasn't meant for you. But obviously 99% of us have *something* to learn.

So how do we learn it? If some want to sing the virtues of trial and error, fine. I don't personally find this an effective use of my time, nor do I think the rare success stories from this approach are sufficient for the rest of us to throw outside education to the dogs.

Bottom line, READ her post. Don't just skim for highlights. If you are getting rejected all the time and wonder why, she has an answer for you. If you resemble her remarks and don't like it, I'm sorry. If you're getting rave reviews with every check you write, then why worry about it? You're in the 1 percent.

Janell
Living proof that a little knowledge is dangerous
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 5:22 PM
Factuality

Joined on 08-18-2004
USA
Posts 326
Post Icon RE: RE: Writers who don''''t try to learn their trade
QUOTE: Originally posted by lisaloganwrites
[So how do we learn it? If some want to sing the virtues of trial and error, fine. I don't personally find this an effective use of my time, nor do I think the rare success stories from this approach are sufficient for the rest of us to throw outside education to the dogs.

Bottom line, READ...

It looks like you parachuted right down into the same line of wild fire that Diane got shot by!

I appreciate the point you are making and feel compelled to paraphrase and reiterate it because I believe it is important, maybe not to some of the more prolific posters here, but certainly to newer members and other readers of this forum.

People may start writing for publication without ever learning anything more than they remember from elementary-school, high-school or college about writing. But if they start getting rejections, what's the best thing they can do? Keep on writing just they way they always have, or start reading to learn what they might do differently?

I think the point here is that you need both knowledge and practice, and when you find that your existing knowledge isn't getting you published, then you need to start learning new things to try in your writing. (You need to read the driver's manual to learn what you need to know to pass the test and get a license--just knowing how to drive is not enough). If you've never had that problem, that's nice, but if the market changes or if you enter markets with different criteria for publication, you may want to adapt your style to get published, and how will you learn to adapt your style? As an exampe, I used to write for businesses, professional journals, and academia. When I applied what I knew to writing a book for commercial publication, I first read a lot about getting published--I learned a lot and I got great responses to my queries, but my manuscripts were rejected a lot. I came to realize that I needed to do something else--so I read more, this time about writing. I had to learn how to write differently for commercial publication--only then did I get an agent.

If you're a subscriber to "The Writer" and you read it, then you are reading to keep up with ideas that will help you get published or continue to be published. Should you drop your subscription because you've been published? I don't think so.

Why should readers read our nonfiction? Should they just "do" and not "read" to learn? Should we stop publishing because people need to learn by doing, not by reading? I think we have a ridiculous argument here.
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 5:39 PM
zubbycat

Joined on 05-12-2004
Canada
Posts 1,064
RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
Interesting discussion. I am a strong believer in having a balance between the two. If all I do is read books about writing and I never practise writing, I won't grow in my skill. If all I do is write, but I never read to learn more about technique, language, etc, I won't grow in my skill and try new things. I believe it has to be done in moderation.

I'll use my day job as an example - in university, I got all the book-learning I could handle and got my engineering degree. But I believe that I didn't really start to grow in my skill until I got out in the field and started practising it. Okay, so then I was putting all my effort into practical experience. But I came to a point where I needed to learn more about certain aspects of my job. So what did I do? I bought some books by experts and my company sent me to a course. I got the book learning again and then came back and applied it in the practical arena so my skill grew.

I don't really believe that one can be separated from the other. Both are necessary.

zubbycat :)

"Never try to outstubborn a cat." - Unknown
"Writing is easy. All you have to do is cross out the wrong words." - Mark Twain
   Report Abuse 
   02-04-2005, 8:24 PM
St.George

Joined on 06-11-2003
Posts 360
RE: Writers who don't try to learn their trade
put it this way - you can learn to drive a car totally by getting in behind the wheel and driving with your pal/parents/mate.

you might get your license, but you may end up in situations that you have no idea what to do - only because perhaps your pal/parents/mate haven't been there, so they couldn't tell you what to do.

that's where reading the book comes in - those vague little laws and street rules like a four-way stop or how to signal if you're riding a bicycle...

you can have one or the other, but having both makes you a better driver overall.

peas, out!
   Report Abuse 
   02-05-2005, 3:30 AM
Rosarium

Joined on 10-19-2003
Texas
Posts 142
RE: Writers who don''t try to learn their trade
Good points are made by Zubbycat and St. George. Also, there is the fact that different people learn things in different ways. Some learn best by reading, some by doing, some by hearing, and some by watching.

Let's say Juan grew up in Key West, Florida (where today's low of 60F, is only 28 degrees above freezing) then one day Juan moved to Artic Village, Alaska (where it will be a high of negative 25F today). Juan will suddenly find himself having to learn a lot of new stuff from books like Doggsledding for Dunces, Artic Living for Re-located Floridians, and Your Travel Agent's Guide to Artic Winter Survival 101, the last of which begins, "Tip #1 - Call us and arrange to spend Labor Day to Memorial Day in Key West or someother warm sunny location."

If he had read these before moving, maybe he wouldn't have moved, but with the combination of experience and reading, Juan would probably decide to go back to Key West, at least unil Memorial Day.

my [2c], fwiw,

Rosarium

eta - One is never to old for milk and cookies, if one thinks one is too old, one should go drink some milk while eating some cookies.
   Report Abuse 
  Page 2 of 6 (109 items) < 1 2 3 4 5 > ... Last »
The Writer » FREE forums: General (open to all; must register to post) » Pet peeves Forum Jump:

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems